Legal Opinion

Grodinsky v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 3, 1981No. Civ. A. M-80-722 to M-80-728 and M-79-2330PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.

This litigation arose out of the crash of Quebecaire flight # 255 at Ancienne Lorette Airport in Quebec, Canada, on March 29, 1979. The plaintiff in Civil Action No. M-79-2330 (the Proulx case) is the representative of the estate of a deceased passenger. The plaintiffs in Civil Action Nos. M-80-722 through M-80-728, are passengers who were allegedly injured in the same airplane crash. All plaintiffs are subjects of the Dominion of Canada and reside in that country. Defendant Fairchild Industries, Inc. (Fairchild), is a Delaware…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hodson v. AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
  2. In Re Air Crash Disaster at Washington, D.C. on January 13, 1982District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  3. Mills v. Aetna Fire Underwriters InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Johnson v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. In Re Air Crash Disaster Near Bombay, Etc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API