Legal Opinion

Warren v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 24, 1966No. 5219PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hugh M. Bland, Justice.

The appellant was convicted for the crime of unlawfully and feloniously selling intoxicating liquor in a prohibited area in Sharp County Arkansas and the jury fixed his punishment at a fine of $1,000.00. From this judgment and conviction appellant has perfected his appeal.

Appellant does not contend that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction, hut relies entirely on two points:

“I. The defendant was deprived of the protection of Arkansas Statutes 39-206 and 39-208 and of his state and federal constitutional guarantees under Art. 2 Secs. 7, 8, 13, 18, 21…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. ReutzelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  2. Mell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Trotter & Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  5. Hudspeth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  2. Meyers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1992
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2007
  5. Waddle v. SargentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API