Legal Opinion

People v. Drennan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Exceptions before judgment from Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Bespondent was convicted of engaging in the business of selling liquors without having paid the tax required by Act No. 313, Laws of 1887. Conviction reversed, and new trial ordered. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The respondent was convicted in the Wayne circuit court upon the charge that he was engaged on the 28th day of May, 1889, at the city of Wyandotte, in the business of selling, by retail, malt, brewed, fermented, and intoxicating liquors, without having paid the tax required by law upon such business; he not being then and there a druggist, etc.

It seems that the complaint and warrant upon which respondent was arrested and held to trial did not negative that Drennan was a druggist. Eespondent pleaded to the information, which contained the proper averment that he was not a druggist, etc. When…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BoosMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API