Legal Opinion

State v. Blumenthal

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Cross Circuit Court; W. J. Driver, Judge. Dr. H. M. Blumenthal was indicted for arson. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the indictment, the State appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This appeal is prosecuted by the State to reverse a judgment sustaining a demurrer to an indictment for arson against Dr. H. M. Blumenthal. There was an agreement between counsel for the State and for the defendant that it was the intention in the indictment to charge the defendant with wilfully and maliciously and feloniously setting fire to and burning a dwelling house belonging to Mrs. Sallie A. Hancock while he was in possession of it and occupied as her tenant. It appears from the record that the court below sustained the demurrer upon the agreed statement of facts.

We will treat the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Trustees of Brimfield v. Commissioners of PortageOhio Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Snyder v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Garrett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Furth v. FurthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  5. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whitfield v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API