Legal Opinion

Piggott v. Agnew

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 23, 1976No. 114; No. 31938Published

1Opinion of the CourtTamkin, J.

This is an action of contract to recover for work done under an employment contract. The plaintiff’s declaration, which sets forth the eleven (11) defendants with whom he made the contract, is as follows:

Count 1.

Plaintiff says that the defendants, John W. Agnew, D. Stuart DeBard, Joseph R. Guertin, Robert J. Kane, Walter J. Kelliher, Donald R. Marquis, George R. McCarthy, Shepard A. Spunt, Richard W. Stokes, James L. Sullivan and Augustus Thorndike, d/b/a "Ten Men of Massachusetts’ ’, at a meeting held on August 9, 1973, agreed to employ the plaintiff as their Executive Director for a period…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Paraboschi v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Tyler v. Boot & Shoe Workers UnionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Siegel v. KnottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Sullivan v. Judges of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Thomas v. BensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API