EQT Production Co. v. Magnum Hunter Production Co.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Joseph M. Hood, Senior United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court upon Defendant Magnum, Hunter Production Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [DE 23] and Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 62], as well as Plaintiff EQT Production Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [DE 63], All Motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for the Court’s review. [DE 27, 28, 48, 52, 62, 63, 67, 68, 71, 72]. For the reasons stated herein, IT IS ORDERED that Magnum Hunter’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED, while the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McPherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heartland Materials, Inc. v. Warren Paving, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Evans v. Novolex Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
- Whitaker v. Powers Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022