Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Baker Bros.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception. — The case was submitted to the Court below without a jury, on an agreed statement of facts, the right of appeal being reserved. The plaintiff offered the following prayer: That under the agreed statement of facts in this case the plaintiff is entitled to recover $1,394.95, with interest- from the 31st of January, 1893, and costs.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception. — The case was submitted to the Court below without a jury, on an agreed statement of facts, the right of appeal being reserved. The plaintiff offered the following prayer: That under the agreed statement of facts in this case the plaintiff is entitled to recover $1,394.95, with interest- from the 31st of January, 1893, and costs. The defendants offered the following prayers: 1. That under the agreed statement of facts in this case the whole of said stock is not properly taxable in said city, and…

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.

This case was tried in the Baltimore City Court on an •agreed statement of facts. The agreement shows that Charles J. Baker, William Baker, Jr., and Charles E. Baker, compose the firm of Baker Bros, and Company; that Charles E. Baker is a resident of Baltimore City, and the other two members of the firm are residents of Baltimore County; that Charles J. Baker has a fourteuths interest, and the other two have each a three-tenths interest, in the firm. It is admitted that the place of business of the firm is on Charles street, in Baltimore City, at which place is kept the stock of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hooper v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
  2. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. Appeal Tax CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. Greyhound Computer Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Manchester Nat. Bank v. Roche, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  4. McLane v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  5. Myers & Houseman v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API