Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Sklar

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1940No. 6017PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

On November 30, 1937, plaintiff filed suit to recover workman’s compensation on the. basis of permanent total disability. He avers that he was injured oh or about August 25, 1937, while performing the duties of his employment with the Louisiana Iron & Supply Company, alleged to be a Louisiana corporation. Citation was directed to the alleged employer and personal service was made by delivery .of citation and copy of the petition to Sam Sklar, “President”.

No action, it appears, was taken in the case until May 28, 1938. On that date a supplemental petition was tendered and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Norwood v. Lake Bisteneau Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  2. Brister v. Wray Dickinson Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  3. Callender v. MarksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  5. Vernon v. Illinois Cent. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Guidry v. TheriotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Francis v. Herrin Transportation CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Harris v. Traders General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  4. Tate v. Gullett Gin Company & Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Johnson v. El Dorado Creosoting Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API