Legal Opinion

Railroad v. Wallace

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1891PublishedCited by 15 opinions

J?R0M SUMNER. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Sunnier County. II. C. Carter, Sp. J.

1Opinion of the Court

SnodsRASS, <T.

The defendant in error, while in tlie service of the Louisville and Nashville Hailroad Company as brakeman, sustained severe personal iujury resulting, in the loss of a leg, which he alleged was occasioned by ’ the negligence of the company. He sued for $15,000 damages, and recovered judgment for $9,940.

The railroad company appealed and assigned numerous errors. It is not deemed material to notice but one of them, as the others are not well taken, and involve nothing new so as to make their consideration in a written opinion necessary.

The one material to be considered relates to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Chicago v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Pittsburgh Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  5. Ratteree v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co. v. PrattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. Thompson Towing & Wrecking Ass'n v. McGregorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  4. Cochran v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Daly v. Swift & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API