State v. Navarre

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

| defendant Freddie Navarre appeals his conviction by a jury of aggravated rape of a juvenile under the age of thirteen. He alleges that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict of aggravated rape.

For the following reasons, we affirm.

ISSUE

We shall consider whether the evidence was insufficient to prove aggravated rape beyond a reasonable doubt. .

LAW AND DISCUSSION

Defendant’s sole assignment of error is that the State failed to prove all the elements of aggravated rape: He argues the only evidence of the rape was the victim’s testimony, which contained'…