Legal Opinion

Delahoussaye v. Ackal

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1971No. 3276PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a suit for the rentals due under a written contract of lease of immovable property. The plaintiff, Henry M. Dela-houssaye, is the lessor. The defendants, Anthony Ackal and Bryan Bailey, are the lessees. Ackal’s defense, on the grounds of a discharge in bankruptcy, was sustained, and suit against him was dismissed. Judgment by default was rendered against Bailey for the sum of $9,100. Bailey has appealed.

The issue on appeal is whether the default judgment was confirmed by sufficient proof.

LSA-C.C.P. Article 1702 reads as follows:

“A judgment of default must be confirmed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Francois v. CloudLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Jenkins v. TillmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Loyola University, Radio-WWL-TV Station v. Lakeside Rambler Sales, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delahoussaye v. AckalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  2. Manuel v. Peninsular Life Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Delahoussaye v. AckalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API