Delahoussaye v. Ackal
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CULPEPPER, Judge.
This is a suit for the rentals due under a written contract of lease of immovable property. The plaintiff, Henry M. Dela-houssaye, is the lessor. The defendants, Anthony Ackal and Bryan Bailey, are the lessees. Ackal’s defense, on the grounds of a discharge in bankruptcy, was sustained, and suit against him was dismissed. Judgment by default was rendered against Bailey for the sum of $9,100. Bailey has appealed.
The issue on appeal is whether the default judgment was confirmed by sufficient proof.
LSA-C.C.P. Article 1702 reads as follows:
“A judgment of default must be confirmed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Francois v. CloudLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Jenkins v. TillmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Loyola University, Radio-WWL-TV Station v. Lakeside Rambler Sales, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- Delahoussaye v. AckalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Manuel v. Peninsular Life Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Delahoussaye v. AckalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971