People v. Ohrenstein
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentSimons, J.
I agree with the majority *55that the counts of the indictment founded on defendants’ use of their regular employees for political activities in addition to legislative duties must be dismissed (Categories 1 and 2). I also agree that the counts of the indictment charging defendants with certifying the salary of four "no-shows”, persons placed on the legislative payroll who performed no duties, should stand (Category 4). I disagree, however, with the dismissal of the charges alleging that defendants unlawfully authorized payment from State funds to persons whose only duties consisted of working…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gilligan v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.