Legal Opinion

Wayne Savings & Loan Co. v. Young

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1976No. 1407PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas in a foreclosure action denying á junior lienholder’s motion to set aside a sale because an alleged unforeseen occurrence prevented the junior lien* holder from arriving at the sale in time to bid. The court also rejected the junior lienholder’s attempts after the sale to exercise a right of redemption, either as a lien-holder or as assignee of the “debtor.” We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The defendant, Fair Financial Services of Medina, Inc., the appellant, was the third lienholder, after taxes and costs, of premises…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powers v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  2. Higgs v. McDuffieOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hoyd v. Citizens Bank of Albany Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vieland v. First Federal Savings Bank (In Re Vieland)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  2. Hembree v. Mid-America Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Ohio Department of Taxation v. PlickertOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Daneman v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (In Re Hoff)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
  5. Gallardo v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank (In Re Gallardo)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API