Legal Opinion
The Raleigh
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 20, 1943No. 2598PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, District Judge.
This is a libel suit brought for the loss and damage of part of a cargo of super-phosphate shipped by the Baugh Chemical Company, at Baltimore, on its barge, the Raleigh, consigned to an affiliated company, Baugh & Sons Company, at Norfolk, Virginia. The latter company has paid the Baugh Chemical Company for the super-phosphate, and while the libel was originally filed by the Baugh Chemical Company as owner of the barge Raleigh and bailee of the cargo, Baugh & Sons Company was subsequently allowed to intervene as owner of the damaged cargo, in order that any recovery…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Southgate v. Eastern Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Shepard S. S. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Koppers Connecticut Coke Co. v. James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Chesapeake Bay Bridge & Tunnel District v. Oil Screw PrinceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968