Legal Opinion

Haag v. Stickley

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 2, 1990No. Record 890635PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Compton

In this appeal, we determine whether the trial court correctly construed and interpreted a will.

At issue is Kenneth Lee Otto Haag’s holographic will dated January 20, 1983, and a holographic codicil dated October 5, 1985. The testator died in May 1986, and the will was duly probated in the Clerk’s Office of the court below. Helen B. Haag, the testator’s former wife, qualified as executor of the estate, which included 689 shares of common stock in the Front Royal Supply Company, Inc. The inventory showed the value of the stock to be in excess of $254,000.

In May 1987, appellees John Stickley…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Horne v. HorneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  2. Thomas v. CopenhaverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Warner v. BaylorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  4. Timberlake v. State-Planters Bank of Commerce & TrustsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960
  5. Waters v. TrefouretSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Feeney, S. v. FeeneySupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
  2. Haag v. StickleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  3. In re Estate of ParsonsRichmond County Circuit Court · 2004
  4. Larsen v. StackSupreme Court of Virginia · 2020
  5. Thadani v. MalkaniFairfax County Circuit Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API