Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Bd. of Commr. of Sequoyah Cty.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 11, 1912No. 2966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court,, Sequoyah County; J. H. Pitchford, Judge. Remonstrance by W. L. Curtis and others against the issuance of bonds by the Board of County Commissioners of Se-quoyah County. From a judgment overruling the remonstrance, the remonstrants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This controversy arose out of an attempt by Sequoyah county to refund its outstanding warrant indebtedness under article 7 of chapter 8, Comp. Laws 1909, entitled "An act to enable counties, municipal corporations, the boards of education of any city or school districts to refund their indebtedness." It seems that upon the publication of the notice required by section 409 of said statute the plaintiff in error herein, representing various taxpayers, appeared before the board of county commissioners and interposed certain objections to the refunding proceedings, which objections were…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Application of B of E of City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API