Kupis v. Wilmington Provision Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Rice, J.,
deivering the opinion of the court:
The appellant claims (1) that when a specific permanent injury follows a period of total disability, there should be no deduction from the' period of compensation specified under Section 103, subsec. (c), for compensation paid under Section 103, subsec. (a), for total disability; (2) That under Paragraph 20 of Subsection (c) it is the amount of compensation which varies, and not the period; (3) that all compensation under Subsection (c) is subject to the maximum and minimum prescribed in the last paragraph of this subsection.
Code 1915, § 3193j, at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- De Zeng Standard Co. v. PresseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Spurgeon v. Iowa & Missouri Granite WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Casey-Hedges Co. v. LynchTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- James A. Banister Co. v. KrigerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Maziarski v. George A. Ohl & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
3Cited by2 opinions
- Richardson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Richardson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930