Legal Opinion

Mills v. Mills

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1936No. 29461PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This is an action at law upon three promissory notes. A. J. Mills, on March 17, 1932, filed his petition in the district court for Hitchcock county, alleging that the defendants, C. E. Mills, B. O. Mills, and J. E. Mills, were indebted to him on three promissory notes, for which indebtedness he prayed judgment. Defendants B. O. Mills and J. E. Mills answered that the notes in suit were given to evidence the • purchase price of certain'horses sold by A. J. Mills to C. E. Mills; that there was no other consideration therefor; that *882plaintiff advised the answering defendants that he did not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ancient v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Campbell v. YoungsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  3. City of Omaha v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hamilton v. BayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Shandy v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rose v. KahlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hurley v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Koehn v. KoehnNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Nelson v. JanssenNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Thurston County Farm Bureau v. Thurston CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API