Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Ladd v. Estate of Ladd

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 14, 1994No. 92-108Published

1DissentMorse, J.

The Court holds that a divorce is final only when the nisi period is “absolute.” If a party dies before then, the divorce “abates” and is “nullified.” Not only does this sound archaic, the holding undermines the purpose of nisi decrees and is contrary to a recent amendment to the statute governing them. I respectfully dissent.

The only Vermont precedent underpinning the Court’s senseless result is dictum in In re Hanrahan’s Will, 109 Vt. 108, 128, 194 A. 471, 481 (1937) (“well settled that nisi divorce decrees do not dissolve the marriages, and that the death of either party before they become…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. In Re Hanrahan's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Poston v. PostonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. Richwagen v. RichwagenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API