Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life & Travelers Insurance Co. v. Antonucci

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 4, 1985No. BC-247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZEHMER, Judge:

In this workers’ compensation case, the employer and carrier seek review of an order of the deputy commissioner that does not dispose of all matured issues in controversy between the parties. Claimant’s attorney filed a claim and requested a hearing on issues of temporary total disability, medical treatment, interest, costs, and attorney’s fees. At the beginning of the hearing, claimant’s attorney announced, pursuant to agreement by opposing counsel, that the proceeding would be bifurcated and the employer and carrier “will assert the Statute of Limitations and I guess that may…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. S. WINE & SPIRITS, INC. v. HernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Sheffield Steel Products v. TrippDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Industrial Steel v. RobinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. La Croix Construction Co. v. BushDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Seidlin v. State ex rel. LorieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ralston Purina v. TancakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Bass v. FertilizerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Smith v. Sarasota Professional SportsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API