Legal Opinion

Gottlieb v. Crowe

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1937No. 24207. Appellate Court reversed; municipal court affirmedPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shaw

Plaintiff (appellant here) brought an action in the municipal court of Chicago to recover on three bonds of $500 each, with interest thereon, against the defendants on their guaranty to pay the bonds. The defendant S. A. Crowe, Jr., was not served with process and did not enter his appearanee. Stoll will hereafter be referred to as the defendant. There was a trial before the court without a jury and a finding and judgment in plaintiff’s favor for $1583. An appeal was taken to the Appellate Court for the First District where the judgment of the trial court was reversed, and the cause is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ObucinoIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Chamblin v. ChamblinIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Town of Kingston v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Demilly v. GrosrenaudIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Tomkins v. TomkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. HaightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  5. Allen v. KaplanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API