Legal Opinion

Anand v. Kapoor

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2010No. 222PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary.

While playing golf with two friends at a nine-hole course in Suffolk County, defendant Anoop Kapoor “shanked” a shot, striking plaintiff Azad Anand in the left eye, with the errant ball. The accident occurred during play on the first hole. Kapoor’s second shot landed in the “rough.” Without waiting for Kapoor to retrieve his ball, Anand went to look for his on the fairway. Kapoor, meanwhile, found his ball and,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Turcotte v. FellNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Rinaldo v. McGovernNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Custodi v. Town of AmherstNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Pfenning v. LinemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Fenty v. Seven Meadows Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Toro v. New York Racing Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Layden v. PlanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API