Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Shanklin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1925No. Appeal 11PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The indictment on which appellant was tried and convicted contained four counts. The first three charged a violation of section 169 of the Criminal Code of March 31,1860, P. L. 382, forbidding the fraudulent making, signing, altering, uttering or publishing of a written instrument, (other than bank notes, bills, cheeks or drafts), to the prejudice of another’s right, with intent to defraud any person or body corporate; the fourth, the fraudulent conversion of the property of another, contrary to the provisions of the Act of May 18, 1917, P. L. 241; the second section of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BeamishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  2. Commonwealth v. BachopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. McClure v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
  4. Biles v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  5. Commonwealth v. LubergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KramerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Commonwealth v. NicholsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownBerks County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1928
  5. Commonwealth v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API