Andersen v. Luikart
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
This is an action to foreclose a real estate mortgage. The ‘ mortgagors made no appearance, and decree was entered against them by default. Luikart, as receiver for the Upland Banking Company and receiver for the People’s Bank of Upland, filed cross-petitions, seeking foreclosure of two mortgages. One of the mortgages was for $5,990, in which the Upland Banking Company was named as mortgagee; the other for $1,900, in which the People’s Bank of Upland was named as mortgagee.
In his cross-petitions as receiver, Luikart charges that the principal of plaintiff’s mortgage had been extinguished or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dinslage v. StratmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
- Meduna v. Estate of DaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Novak v. ReesonNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
- Kamrath v. HodgesNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
- Sides v. HumpeNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jones v. EwartNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Ralston v. MargetNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
- Marley v. New York Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1946