Legal Opinion

Andersen v. Luikart

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1934No. 28984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action to foreclose a real estate mortgage. The ‘ mortgagors made no appearance, and decree was entered against them by default. Luikart, as receiver for the Upland Banking Company and receiver for the People’s Bank of Upland, filed cross-petitions, seeking foreclosure of two mortgages. One of the mortgages was for $5,990, in which the Upland Banking Company was named as mortgagee; the other for $1,900, in which the People’s Bank of Upland was named as mortgagee.

In his cross-petitions as receiver, Luikart charges that the principal of plaintiff’s mortgage had been extinguished or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dinslage v. StratmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Meduna v. Estate of DaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Novak v. ReesonNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kamrath v. HodgesNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Sides v. HumpeNebraska Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. EwartNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Ralston v. MargetNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Marley v. New York Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API