Bergkvist v. Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
The 1929 amendment to the defendant’s rules which required actions arising from the death of a member to be brought “ within three years from the date of such death ” was valid and bound the plaintiff’s husband, a member, and the plaintiff as beneficiary; and the fact that it was not until 1940 that the plaintiff learned of the death of her husband, which occurred in 1929, does not affect the situation. (Born v. Perkins, 173 App. Div. 214, affd. on opinion below 223 N. Y. 605.) Under the terms of the certificate of membership the defendant had the power to change its rules, and the changes…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Weber v. Supreme Tent of Knights of MacCabees of WorldNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Evans v. Southern Tier Masonic Relief Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Born v. . PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Born v. PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bergkvist v. Supreme Council of the Royal ArcanumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- State v. Colton, No. Cr6-289646 (Jan. 5, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994