Lee v. Hoffman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polk District Court. — Lawrence DeG-raff, Judge. The plaintiffs and others in the same class, and all minors, were by the defendants excluded from the benefits of a public school, under a rule adopted by the defendant board. A petition seeking a mandatory order to restore the plaintiffs to admission in said schools was dismissed, and thé plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
1. Schools and school districts: pupils, conduct, and discipline: expulsion: Anti-Fraternity Act. I. The argument Of appellant assumes that legislative enactments are ° open to every objection that may be made tó a mere rule or to an ordinance. And in support of attack upon the statute upon whicli appellees rely for authority to do what they did, appellant refers us to cases which nullify mere rules and ordinances, and to general language 'in these cases which, broad as it is, must still be limited to rules and ordinances. See Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 356 (6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1064); Bear v.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Board of Directors of Independent School District v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Wilson v. Abilene Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Kruck v. NeedlesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Bunger Ex Rel. Bunger v. Iowa High School Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Welsh v. DarlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.