Legal Opinion
MAM v. State, Department of Family Services
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 2004No. C-03-13PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[11] This is an appeal from an order and judgment on the pleadings in which the district court denied a petition to declare the non-existence of a father-child relationship and denied a motion to set aside a stipulated paternity order. Finding an abuse of discretion under the particular facts of this case, we reverse.
ISSUES
[12] The appellant states the issues as follows:
1. Did the district court err by applying the wrong statute?
2. Was Appellant entitled to relief from the Stipulated Order for paternity?
3. Is it a violation of public policy to promote the legal fiction that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Byerly v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- U.S. Aviation, Inc. v. Wyoming Avionics, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Claassen v. NordWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Van Riper v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Michel Skaf, M.D. v. Wyoming Cardiopulmonary Services, P.C., a Wyoming corporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- In Re Estate of JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Noonan v. NoonanWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Robert C. Carson v. State of Wyoming, Ex Rel., Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- In the Matter of the J. Kent Kinniburgh Revocable Trust Dated January 27, 1992, as Amended and Restated: Janel K. Kinniburgh, Beneficiary and Successor Trustee of the J. Kent Kinniburgh Revocable Trust Dated January 27, 1992 v. Jacque Moncur and Rosemary Steele, Successor Co-Trustees of the J. Kent Kinniburgh Revocable Trust Dated January 27, 1992Wyoming Supreme Court · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.