Legal Opinion

People v. Lippincott

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The question involved in this case arises upon the following petition, to which a demurrer was filed by the defendant: To the Honorable the Justices of the Supreme Court, at the term begun and held at Ottawa on the second Tuesday of September, A. B. 1872: Respectfully represents unto your Honors, Norman L. Freeman, of the county of Sangamon, and State of Illinois, that on the first day of March, A. D. 1869, he was appointed by your honorable court Reporter of the Decisions…

Read the full summary

The question involved in this case arises upon the following petition, to which a demurrer was filed by the defendant: To the Honorable the Justices of the Supreme Court, at the term begun and held at Ottawa on the second Tuesday of September, A. B. 1872: Respectfully represents unto your Honors, Norman L. Freeman, of the county of Sangamon, and State of Illinois, that on the first day of March, A. D. 1869, he was appointed by your honorable court Reporter of the Decisions thereof, which said office was accepted by" him and he duly qualified-as such Reporter, and which said office he still…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

The relator prays for the writ of mandamus to be directed to the auditor, commanding him to issue his warrant upon the treasury for the price of the printed volumes of the reports of this court, in conformity to the certificate of the secretary of State.

It has been stipulated between, the parties that the fiscal year begins on the first Monday of December in each year, and that the first fiscal quarter after the adjournment of the last regular session of the general assembly ended on the 31st day of August, 1872."

The only question submitted for decision is whether section 18 of article 4 of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Brinkerhoff v. SwigertIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. People ex rel. Harts v. LippincottIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. State ex rel. Stephens v. State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Davis v. CornellNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API