Marysville & Colorado Land Co. v. Heyde

Neither the abstract nor the transcript shows any judgment in this case; hence we would be justified in dismissing the writ of error. Martin v. Way, 86 Colo. 232, 280 Pac. 488. However, it appears that on April 18, 1931, the court ordered that judgment be entered on the verdict; and as the case is argued here by counsel for both parties on the theory that there was a judgment, we shall proceed on that theory. If the' clerk of the district court neglected to enter judgment, he should forthwith enter it nunc pro tunc as of April 18, 1931.

Dora M. Heyde, called herein the plaintiff, sued the…