Martin v. Martin

OPINION

This proper person appeal arises from a custody dispute between appellant April Martin and respondent James Martin over the parties’ twelve-year-old child. The district court granted James’s motion to change primary physical custody based on changed circumstances. These changed circumstances included James’s remarriage and April’s alleged interference with James’s visitation with the child.

We conclude that remarriage alone does not establish changed circumstances. Consequently, the district court erred in finding changed circumstances on that basis. Additionally, although a custodial…