Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gerard v. Department of Transportation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 15, 1984No. AV-327Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErvin, Chief Judge

I concur in all aspects of the majority’s opinion, except that portion holding that appellant’s action cannot be allowed to proceed in the circuit court in order for him to establish a predicate for a possible claim request before the legislature. If I correctly understand the majority’s position, it has adopted the appellee’s argument that once the statutory cap authorized by subsection (5) has been exhausted by payment, the circuit court then has no subject matter jurisdiction to enter a judgment for any additional amount. I find nothing in the act barring an injured claimant from seeking a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Cauley v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. BD. OF CTY. COMM'RS OF MADISON CTY. v. GriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Ranger Ins. Co. v. Travelers Indem.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. INGRAHAM EX REL. INGRAHAM v. Dade County School Bd.Supreme Court of Florida · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API