Legal Opinion

State v. Werst

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEkyiN, J.

The testimony of the prosecution was sufficient to take the ease to the jury and to support the verdict for the State. S. v. Cancelmo, 86 Or. 379, 168 P. 721. Consequently the court rightly refused to dismiss the action upon a compulsory nonsuit under G.S. 15-173. Whatever error the court below may have committed in temporarily excluding the evidence of the defendant’s witness, Yelma Smoot, as to the circumstances confronting the accused at the "time in controversy was rendered harmless when the same evidence was subsequently given by the same witness without objection on her further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Eaves Ex Rel. Eaves v. CoxeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. CancelmoOregon Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PeedenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. State v. TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API