Legal Opinion
Tako v. Mayer Rothkopf Industries, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 7, 1980No. 80-245PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by the Takos, the plaintiffs below, from a non-final order quashing service of process on Mayer Rothkopf Industries, Inc. and Mayer & Cie. We have jurisdiction. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i).
We affirm the order of the trial court upon a holding that (1) the plaintiffs, whose complaint, in pertinent part, alleged that the defectively manufactured machine which caused injury to Reuven Tako was sold by the defendant manufacturers/brokers to Reuven Tako’s employer in 1972, obviously could not show that the machine was manufactured after July 1, 1973, the effective date of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Elmex Corp. v. Atlantic Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Electro Engineering Products Co., Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Griffis v. JC Penny Company, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Joyce Bros. Storage & Van Co. v. PiechalakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Yachts v. Ray Richard, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weatherhead Co. v. ColettiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Hunter v. Challenge Machinery Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Jamil v. AcostaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997