Legal Opinion

Lantz v. Chandler

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 5, 1960PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The declaration in this action of contract contains three counts but we are concerned only with the first, which is on an account annexed. Recovery was sought on quantum meruit for substantial performance of a building contract. The judge found for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,885. A report to the Appellate Division was dismissed and the defendants appealed.

At the trial there was evidence tending to establish the following: The plaintiff, a builder, entered into a written contract with the defendants to build a house. The plaintiff commenced to build the house in July, 1957, and continued…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kagan v. LevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. Bowen v. KimbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Russo v. Charles I. Hosmer, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Lynch v. CulhaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Hub Construction Co. v. Dudley Wood Works Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. ALBRE MARBLE & TILE CO. INC. v. GovermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. HAYECK BUILDING & REALTY CO. INC. v. TurcotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Charles L. Hazelton & Son, Inc. v. TeelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Callahan v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  5. Salem Glass Co. v. Joseph Rugo, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API