Legal Opinion

Metlox Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1967No. 20299_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASHINGTON, Senior Circuit Judge:

The Company in this case claimed that it could not give a wage increase or grant other economic benefits to its employees because of financial inability on its part. The Union suggested that the inability to pay might be due to inefficient management, to excessive executive salaries, or to a bleeding of the assets by controlling stockholders. The Company’s reply offered to allow the Union to choose a Certified Public Accountant, subject to the Company’s approval, and to permit him to make an unlimited examination of the Company’s books. The examination was to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corporation, Wright Aeronautical Division v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Teleprompter Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  2. United Furniture Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. Facet Enterprises, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. Facet Enterprises, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Metlox Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API