Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lindley v. Crider

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 22, 1954No. 4761Published

1DissentRobinson, J.

This case does not come within the provisions of Ark. Stats., § 43-3006; before that section would be applicable, it must be alleged that the defendant is charged in the demanding state “with committing an act in this state or in a third state intentionally resulting in a crime in the state whose executive authority is making the demand. ’ ’ Here there is no allegation that petitioner committed an act in the State of Arkansas or a third state intentionally resulting in a crime in the demanding state, Missouri. In all the extradition documents introduced in evidence it is specifically charged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Wigchert v. LockhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  3. Lawrence v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Levy v. SplainDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1920
  5. In Re BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API