Lindley v. Crider
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentRobinson, J.
This case does not come within the provisions of Ark. Stats., § 43-3006; before that section would be applicable, it must be alleged that the defendant is charged in the demanding state “with committing an act in this state or in a third state intentionally resulting in a crime in the state whose executive authority is making the demand. ’ ’ Here there is no allegation that petitioner committed an act in the State of Arkansas or a third state intentionally resulting in a crime in the demanding state, Missouri. In all the extradition documents introduced in evidence it is specifically charged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Wigchert v. LockhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Lawrence v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
- Levy v. SplainDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1920
- In Re BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.