State v. Mapp
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.
This is an appeal from an out of time granting of a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. We reverse and render.
On July 17, 1987, appellee pled guilty to delivery of a controlled substance, namely cocaine. Punishment was assessed at eight years. On March 17, 1988, eight months after sentencing, appellee filed a “Motion for Rehearing” in the trial court, pro se. The motion alleged that he had been “set up”. The trial court appointed counsel who filed an amended Motion for New Trial two weeks later. The basis of the motion was newly discovered evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Garcia v. DialCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Dugard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Whitmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Deloro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
3Cited by8 opinions
- Licon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
- W.E. O'Neil Construction Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Hagens v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Easton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.