The Tairoa
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtMayer, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). We think it unnecessary in this case to pass upon the question as to whether Revised Statutes Ul S. § 4529, applies to foreign vessels when in an American port. The testimony clearly shows that, when the libelants left the vessel without leave, they had not made a demand for half wages, but had demanded that they be paid off and discharged. They were not entitled to be discharged, nor to receive full pay, and the master properly refused to discharge them. Revised Statutes U. S. § 4530, reads as follows:
“Every seaman on a vessel of tbe United States shall be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The ItalierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- The BelgierDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- The PinnaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
- The HougomontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
3Cited by7 opinions
- The Sonderborg.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- In re WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- United States v. AlbersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Atkies v. MikkelsenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- The HavensideDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.