Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 8, 1940No. 146Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

308 U.S. 473 (1940)

HIGGINS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

v.

SMITH.

No. 146.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued December 5, 1939.

Decided January 8, 1940.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Assistant Attorney General Clark, with whom Solicitor General Jackson and Messrs. Sewall Key, Arnold Raum, and Joseph M. Jones were on the brief, for petitioner.

Mr. David Sher for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · ReedJustice Reed

Certiorari was allowed[1] from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit[2] on account of an asserted conflict between the decision below and that of the Circuit…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Burnet v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API