Legal Opinion

Winkler v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1975No. Appeal, No. 676 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Walter H. Winkler (claimant), a food brokerage traveling salesman and “set-up” man, was discharged from his employment with Tenser, Phipps and Leeper (employer) because of his failure to report his daily job locations. All of the compensation authorities, the Bureau of Employment Security, the referee, and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, denied claimant benefits and he therefore appealed to this Court. These authorities all premised their denials on Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P. L.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Loder v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Shira v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Covell v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Houff Transfer, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. VojtasCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. IacanoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. ThomasCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. CiottiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API