Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Thomas v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 9, 1994No. 94-KH-2767PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In re Thomas, Willie Scott; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 108249.

Writ granted; case remanded. The timeliness provisions of C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(A) do not apply to motions to correct illegal sentences made under La.C.Cr.P. art. 882, which states that illegal sentences “may be corrected at any time.” State ex rel. Foucha v. C.D.C., 93-1001 (La. 9/2/94), 642 So.2d 1274, State ex rel. Johnson v. Day, 92-0122 (La. 5/13/94), 637 So.2d 1062. The district court is therefore ordered to rule on the merits of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TelseeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. DaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Dawson v. BallardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Foucha v. ORLEANS CRIMINAL DIST. COURTSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Stepter v. WhitleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API