One 1968 Buick, 4 Door v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
One 1968 Buick appeals its forfeiture. We reverse.
ISSUES
I. Did the trial court correctly interpret the seizure of property statute 1 as applying at the time of the crime?
II. Was there insufficient evidence to support the forfeiture?
FACTS
On November 19, 1992, the State filed a Complaint for Forfeiture 2 against a 1968 Buick, 4-Door. The complaint alleged that Stephen Armstrong had used the vehicle to transport marijuana on or about February 25 and 28, and March 25, 1992. The complaint further alleged that the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles records…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- P.B. v. T.D.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Joseph v. Lake Ridge School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Blairex Laboratories, Inc. v. ClobesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Indiana State Prison v. SimchakIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by20 opinions
- George M. Epps, Sheriff of City of Petersburg, Virginia v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- Figg v. Bryan Rental Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Sullivan v. DayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Miller v. WalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Indiana Family & Social Services Administration v. RadiganIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.