Legal Opinion
Isaacson v. Dorius
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 1983No. 18166Published
1Opinion of the Court
669 P.2d 849 (1983)
Richard A. ISAACSON, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Clair DORIUS, Defendant and Appellant.
Lawrence W. LYNN, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Clair DORIUS, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 18166.
Supreme Court of Utah.
August 17, 1983.
M. Dayle Jeffs, Provo, for defendant and appellant.
Robert C. Cummings and Gordon A. Madsen, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.
HALL, Chief Justice:
From a judgment holding the defendant Clair Dorius solely responsible for damages resulting from an automobile collision near Fayette, Utah, he appeals to this Court, contending it was error to take the…
Also in this document: Dissent · Stewart; Dissent · Howe.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Alejandro Sanchez v. Board of Regents of Texas Southern UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Evans v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Stirling v. Chemical BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Gaines Lashley and Gaines Lashley as Next of Friend for Ronald Gaines Lashley, a Minor v. Ford Motor Company and Richardson Ford CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.