Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ross v. King

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided July 12, 1955No. 192858PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*555OPINION

By BARTLETT, J.

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL IN FAVOR OF THE RESPONDENTS IS HEREBY ENTERED IN THIS MANDAMUS PROCEEDING, AT RELATOR’S COSTS.

Relator in his petition recites that on or about June 21, 1955, as a resident of this county, he presented to Roy King, Clerk of Courts in this county, a duly executed application, with proper fee, for a Certificate of Title for a 1955 Oldsmobile Deluxe Convertible, Motor No V739643, Manufacturer’s Serial No. 558MJ9934, and requested the issuance of a Certificate of Title for said motor vehicle. Relator further alleged said application was in accordance…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Bavarian Brewing Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  2. Haynes v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Liberty Optical Manufacturing Co. v. Anchor Optical Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1957
  4. State v. NerswickOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API