People v. Esterline
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
Following a jury trial, defendant, Richard Esterline, was found guilty of the offense of indecent liberties with a child (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 11 — 4) and was sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment.
On appeal, defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction, and that the trial court committed the following errors: (1) it admitted into evidence other alleged acts of indecent liberties with other children; (2) it allowed the State to amend the indictment the day before jury selection and denied defendant’s motion for a continuance; and (3) it refused to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. KimbroughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- The People v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- The PEOPLE v. DaughertyIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. PazellIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. DanielsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- People v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- People v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.