Legal Opinion

People v. Esterline

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 3, 1987No. 86-0318PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Following a jury trial, defendant, Richard Esterline, was found guilty of the offense of indecent liberties with a child (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 11 — 4) and was sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment.

On appeal, defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction, and that the trial court committed the following errors: (1) it admitted into evidence other alleged acts of indecent liberties with other children; (2) it allowed the State to amend the indictment the day before jury selection and denied defendant’s motion for a continuance; and (3) it refused to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. KimbroughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. The People v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. The PEOPLE v. DaughertyIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. PazellIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. DanielsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. People v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. People v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API