Legal Opinion

Iehle v. Coleman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1991No. Nos. 2526 and 2527PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether the buyer of a factory building, including sewing equipment, pursuant to a long-term agreement of sale forfeits the right to receive the proceeds of a fire insurance policy by agreeing to pay some or all of such proceeds to the seller who is subsequently convicted of arson in connection with the partial destruction by fire of the factory building and equipment. The trial court determined that there was no such forfeiture and entered summary judgment for the buyers in their action against the insurer. The insurer appealed. We affirm.

On…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Dubin Paper Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Payne v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. French v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alberici v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. GREENTREE PROPERTIES CORPORATION v. ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Scroggins v. JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API