Heiskell v. Furness, Withy & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The main purpose of this action was to recover special damages for the loss of Brode’s sale of peanut meal in England; and much time has been devoted to showing that such damage was recoverable.
*978But that question is not reached until plaintiff has shown a bx*each of contract on defendant’s part giving rise to any damage claim at all.
The written contract between these parties (kixpra) was at “owner’s risk of delay.” We notice this phrase because it was incidentally, considered upon a motion in the District Court on. the’ pleadings herein. The opinion on that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lowber v. BangsSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Dorrance v. Barber & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hellenic Lines, Ltd., Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, and Commodity Credit Corporation, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Insurance Co. of North America v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Petroleum Export Corporation v. Kerr SS Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Grammer S. S. Corp. v. James Richardson & Sons, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931