Legal Opinion

Mid-West State Bank v. Struble

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 15, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The original plaintiff will be referred to as such, though the action is now prosecuted by its receiver. The note sued upon was originally made to" W. J. Donlin. Donlin indorsed it to" plaintiff, as collateral security for a loan made by plaintiff to Donlin. Donlin procured the note sued upon by fraud. Plaintiff is a holder in due course.

I. Defendant’s main contention is that plaintiff extended tbe time of payment of the .note given by Donlin to plaintiff, for which Donlin pledged defendant's, note as security; that such extension of Donlin’s note was without the consent of the defendant;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. HanfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Bank of Montreal v. IngersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Field v. SibleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Binghampton Pharmacy v. First National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Robertson v. BlowerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Decker v. JuzwikSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Andrew v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API