Legal Opinion
Brett Forrester v. Entergy Arkansas, LLC, et al.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided March 4, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00140Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION BRETT FORRESTER PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 3:25-cv-00140-KGB ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff Brett Forrester’s motion to remand (Dkt. No. 10). Defendant Entergy Arkansas, LLC (“Entergy”) filed a response to plaintiff’s motion to remand (Dkt. No. 12), and Forrester filed a reply (Dkt. No. 13). For the following reasons, the Court grants Forrester’s motion to remand to state court but denies his motion for attorney’s fees and costs (Dkt. No. 10). The Court also denies as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Travis v. IrbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.