Legal Opinion

First Security Co. v. Huddle

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1934No. 448PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT

The above entitled cause is now being determined on application of defendant in error for rehearing. Counsel for defendant in error present brief in support of their application.

In our original opinion it was determined that the mortgage was not good because of defective description. Counsel for defendant in- error now cite Volume 7 O. Jur., §33, page 295. While this citation was not referred to, we had examined the text and notes thereunder.

We find nothing in this citation from O. Jur. which changes our previous conclusions.

We are urged to reconsider our previous finding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCaffrey v. . WoodinNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Lamson v. MoffatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Comstock v. ScalesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Gittings v. NelsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Northwestern Mut L Ins v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API